About marriage (an old example by me)

 There are complex legal laws and administrative rules about marriage. There are even income tax regulations about marriage. Why? There are non-ending political discussions that divide people and even influence elections -- silly but sad. That's one way how people get blinded by a non-existing, made up issue, that's how people get stupid.

All these marriage law and official considerations are unnecessary and often harmful!

The law should be protective of children but that's different. The law nor any administrative regulations should not word in their vocabulary. One of the AOA axiom is simplicity, another minimality, ... The marriage is a private affair. Anybody can use or apply this word anyway they want. If you and your partner or partners, any number, any sex characteristics, want to call themselves a marriage it is their prerogative, and this should not have to do anything with law or any government.

This way, when marriage is a purely private affair, people would pay proportional attention to economy and similar without getting distracted by nonsense, and -- for instance -- there would bye no more conflicts between LGBT+ and people whom have the so-called traditional views about marriage -- let everybody does what they like in the given question.

All legal and administrative issues, financial or otherwise, among adults should and can be addressed and resolved between adults without mentioning marriage. This would make people more mature, they should understand their situation, they should have common sense agreements, etc. -- just as adults should. That shortcut notion of marriage may mislead people (and it does), and it creates room for all kind of abuse from law and lawyers and governments, and governmental officers, ....

On the other hand, the relation between a parent (married or not!) is nearly holy, it requires certain simple but deep understanding -- it could be broken only under truly criminal circumstances.